From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 06:24:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 06:24:46 -0500 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:55308 "EHLO www.home.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 06:24:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:30:56 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: John W Fort Cc: patmans@us.ibm.com, andmike@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SCSI host changes, multi-path crap Message-ID: <20021027113056.GB789@alpha.home.local> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:39:59PM +1000, John W Fort wrote: > HEY! andmike and patmans of @us.ibm.com YOU FUCKED UP. > > For two weeks in a row you have submitted code that deliberately > breaks scsi drivers. hmmm you're talking about a development kernel, don't you ? So why are you shouting at people who clean up the drivers that one day you'll be happy to use on production machines ? you participation should have been : "Hey! andmike and patmans, I inform you that your last changes broke these drivers: . Here is the patch to fix them : " I really don't understand how you may reproach problems to people working on a development kernel. This is work in progress. Nothing stable, nothing guaranted to even compile. Perhaps you're too ignorant to understand that and bindly use every latest kernel on all your production servers, believing it will fix any unknown bug ? Or perhaps you were drunk and will apologise today ? Willy