From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: netfilter@interlinx.bc.ca Subject: Re: ip_conntrack-timeouts conflicts with tcp-window-tracking Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:14:38 -0500 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20021028121438.GN27880@pc.ilinx> References: <20021025203433.GJ23228@pc.ilinx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aSnC4ZPPfhCvD8sN" Return-path: To: Netfilter-devel Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --aSnC4ZPPfhCvD8sN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:29:52PM +0100, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >=20 > The tcp-window-tracking patch do provide sysctl control of all the timeout > parameters. Indeed! After deeper examination of the tcp-window-tracking patch I did discover that it provides a whole host of sysctlable values. > Please read the help file. Didn't need to. Read the source. :-) Now I'm off to build and debug a kernel that does not give me an "Invalid argument" when trying to add nat table rules. Thanx, b. --=20 Brian J. Murrell --aSnC4ZPPfhCvD8sN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9vSotl3EQlGLyuXARArTzAKCzwsvb2sAiXl1su7EryL8JgL8vmwCg93fC 3v+/gKdTuRFIZI4+dsu8eBU= =CIkj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aSnC4ZPPfhCvD8sN--