From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: cmm@us.ibm.com
Cc: dipankar@gamebox.net, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:06:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021029025009.969372C28F@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:07:23 -0800." <3DBDB51B.84F97EC1@us.ibm.com>
In message <3DBDB51B.84F97EC1@us.ibm.com> you write:
> > Yes, this is the typical RCU model, except that in this case (IPC),
> > I am not quite sure if it is in effect that different from what Ming/Hugh
> > have done.
>
> Rusty's patch looks good to me. I would like to replace the mempool in
> IPC with this typical RCU model. Rusty, if you like, I will make a patch
> against mm6. There need some cleanups. One thing is that ipc_alloc()
> are called by other places(besides grow_ary()), and they don't need to
> the RCU header structure.
Yes, I noticed that, but I'm not sure it's worth separating
ipc_alloc() and ipc_rcu_alloc() for a couple of temporary allocations.
Anyway, glad you like the patch,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-29 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210270748560.1704-100000@localhost.localdomain>
2002-10-28 1:06 ` [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 14:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-28 21:47 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-29 0:03 ` [RFC][PATCH]ipc rcu alloc/free patch - mm6 mingming cao
2002-10-29 0:26 ` [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch Hugh Dickins
2002-10-29 2:51 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 20:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-28 21:41 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-29 6:11 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-28 22:07 ` mingming cao
2002-10-29 1:06 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2002-10-28 1:15 Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 1:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 4:10 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 17:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-10-28 22:39 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-28 23:52 ` Davide Libenzi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-25 17:20 Cliff White
2002-10-21 19:00 [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 21:49 ` [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch mingming cao
2002-10-24 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 22:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 23:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-25 0:07 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25 4:18 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25 5:53 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 7:27 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25 5:36 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-25 16:53 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-24 23:23 ` mingming cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021029025009.969372C28F@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@gamebox.net \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.