From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzswing.ncsc.mil (jazzswing.ncsc.mil [144.51.68.65]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA17987 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 07:16:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from jazzswing.ncsc.mil (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jazzswing.ncsc.mil with ESMTP id MAA10382 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:14:12 GMT Received: from nox.lemuria.org ([213.191.86.30]) by jazzswing.ncsc.mil with ESMTP id MAA10378 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:14:11 GMT Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:15:43 +0100 From: Tom To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: patches to policy question Message-ID: <20021029131543.C24527@lemuria.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov I've posted a few patches against Russell's default policy, but I've started to wonder about the general workflow. Is Russell's policy worked into the NSA CVS, so the workflow would be 3rd Part -> Russell -> NSA ? Or would it be better if I (or anyone else) would also diff changes against the latest NSA release and post those patches? Is posting here the right way to submit patches anyway? -- PGP/GPG key: http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5 -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.