From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Berra Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Support for RedHat AS2.1? Message-ID: <20021029220336.GF18253@percy.comedia.it> References: <200210280943.40808.defranco@cup.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200210280943.40808.defranco@cup.hp.com> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Oct 29 16:04:01 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:43:40AM -0700, John DeFranco wrote: >I see on the Sistina web page that LVM is supported on RedHat Advanced Server >2.1. So I have a couple of questions: > >2. Which redhat kernel errata (2.4.9-e.3 and/or 2.4.9-e.8)? latest (if that kernel can be called recent) is 2.4.9-e.9 >3. I did try to apply the 1.0.6 version on the 2.4.9-e.3 kernel I got a couple >of patch installation errors (Makefile and lvm-snap.c was missing). Are these >expected? I cannot find any other directions that are specific to AS2.1. Are >there any others? anyway standard lvm patch process supposes you have a stock kernel, and AFAIR that was the only setup supported by sistina (feel free to correct me if i am wrong). i expected a difference in makefile lvm-mod-objs should be correct on rh kernels (read the reject and the original and see for yourself) and lvm-snap.h (not .c) has also been removed. the rest of the patch is more or less a diff between your current lvm files and those in LVM/1.0.6/kernel so you can ignore those. regards, L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \