All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Lee, Jung-Ik" <jung-ik.lee@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: bare pci configuration access functions ?
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:02:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021101010241.GE12405@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72B3FD82E303D611BD0100508BB29735046DFF69@orsmsx102.jf.intel.com>

Wait, first off, are we talking about 2.4, or 2.5 here?  For 2.5 I think
everything is covered, right?

On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 11:29:19AM -0800, Lee, Jung-Ik wrote:
> Question:
> ========
> Will it be desirable to have bare global pci config access functions as seen
> in i386/ia64 pci codes ? It's clean and needs just what it takes - seg, bus,
> dev, func, where, value, and size.

No, I do not think so.  I think the way 2.5 does this is the correct
way.  But as I did that patch, I might be a bit biased :)

We could just force every arch to export the same functions that i386
and ia64 does, that shouldn't be a big deal.  I think this would solve
the problem on 2.4 for pci hotplug, as ACPI is already "cheating" and
doing this right now...

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-01  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-31 19:29 RFC: bare pci configuration access functions ? Lee, Jung-Ik
2002-11-01  1:02 ` Greg KH [this message]
2002-11-01  1:55   ` Lee, Jung-Ik
2002-11-01  2:11     ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-01  2:39 Lee, Jung-Ik
2002-11-01  2:48 ` Greg KH
2002-11-01  4:45 Lee, Jung-Ik
2002-11-01  4:52 Lee, Jung-Ik
2002-11-01  5:38 ` Greg KH
2002-11-04 20:17 Lee, Jung-Ik
2002-11-04 21:30 ` Greg KH
2002-11-04 22:30 Lee, Jung-Ik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021101010241.GE12405@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jung-ik.lee@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.