From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from systemhalted (CPE0080c82c70ca.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.112.224.149]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A8E4829 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 08:42:12 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 10:42:17 -0500 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Placement of hil drivers Message-ID: <20021103154217.GK21694@systemhalted> References: <20021102155723.I20749@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20021102155723.I20749@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > > So it seems to me that all of drivers/hil (in the 2.5 tree) depends > on stuff in drivers/input. Is there any reason it shouldn't be in > drivers/input/hil rather than drivers/hil? Or is there an even better > place to put it? > > I notice that we don't even have the option to select the HIL configure > options in 2.5 at the moment, which means nobody's testing on 715/Scorpio > and similar boxes. This is a shame... my goal for 2.6 is to get to a 20k > diff vs Linus' tree. Which reminds me, it's time for a 2.5 status report. > Coming right up.. > Willy, I could give 2.5 a whirl on the following boxes: 715/50 and 715/33. I'll get back to you with results. Cheers, Carlos.