All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Trivial Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [TRIVIAL] Re: UP went into unexpected trashing
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 19:33:21 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021108083828.699642C456@lists.samba.org> (raw)

[ find_first_bit on x86 returns 32 even if you said to stop at (say) 5
  bits.  Uncovered by the larger cpu mask patch. ]

From:  dipankar@in.ibm.com

  Well, my earlier find_first_bit() implementation was completely bogus.
  My sanity has now returned and I coded this patch below that fixes 
  find_find_bit() to return "size" if all bits are zero. I have tested it 
  extensively in userspace and it boots 2.5.44-mm5 which crashed with the earlier
  version of the bitops_fix patch. I have coded the assembly routine
  as optimal as I could think of and without introducing any new
  branches or memory loads.
  
  Along with this patch, I applied the larger_cpu_mask patch to -mm5
  and sanity tested both UP and SMP kernels for dcache leaks in a 4CPU P3 box.
  An ls -lR and subsequent unmounting of that filesystems showed that
  the dentries were correctly getting returned the dcache slab and
  that indicates that the larger_cpu_mask patch no longer breaks RCU.
  I will do some more testing with this combination later with
  rcu_stats applied on this tree (just to be sure), but so far it looks good.
  
  Thanks
  -- 
  Dipankar Sarma  <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net
  Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.
  
  
  bitops_fix.patch
  -----------------
  

--- trivial-2.5-bk/include/asm-i386/bitops.h.orig	2002-11-08 18:47:20.000000000 +1100
+++ trivial-2.5-bk/include/asm-i386/bitops.h	2002-11-08 18:47:20.000000000 +1100
@@ -311,12 +311,13 @@
 		"repe; scasl\n\t"
 		"jz 1f\n\t"
 		"leal -4(%%edi),%%edi\n\t"
-		"bsfl (%%edi),%%eax\n"
-		"1:\tsubl %%ebx,%%edi\n\t"
+		"bsfl (%%edi),%%edx\n"
+		"subl %%ebx,%%edi\n\t"
 		"shll $3,%%edi\n\t"
-		"addl %%edi,%%eax"
+		"addl %%edi,%%edx\n\t"
+		"1:\tmovl %%edx,%%eax\n\t"
 		:"=a" (res), "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1)
-		:"1" ((size + 31) >> 5), "2" (addr), "b" (addr));
+		:"1" ((size + 31) >> 5), "2" (addr), "b" (addr), "d" (size));
 	return res;
 }
 
-- 
  Don't blame me: the Monkey is driving
  File: dipankar@in.ibm.com: Re: [long]2.5.44-mm3 UP went into unexpected trashing

             reply	other threads:[~2002-11-08  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-08  8:33 Rusty Trivial Russell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-08 14:35 [TRIVIAL] Re: UP went into unexpected trashing Petr Vandrovec
2002-11-08 19:53 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-11-08 20:10   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-09  3:16     ` Rusty Russell
2002-11-09  4:40       ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-10  3:09         ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021108083828.699642C456@lists.samba.org \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.