From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.46: ide-cd cdrecord success report
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:43:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021108114318.GX32005@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021108111428.F628@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de>
On Fri, Nov 08 2002, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Ok I'm just about convinced now, I'll make 16 the default batch count.
> > I'm very happy to hear that the deadline scheduler gets the job done
> > there.
>
> Isn't it exactly seek_cost, which you want?
Yes it's one request for a non-contig range, or a number of contig ones.
It isn't quite clear that this is always a good thing. Since we are
moving request from the sorted list, there's a chance that even though
serving X and then X+1 will incur a seek, it will be a small one. But
for now, yes, a seek is a seek and 16 is equal to seek_cost and
therefore it will be just the one.
> Would you like to make it tunable from user space somehow?
Yes of course, that has been the plan all along. I'm in fact doing that
right now.
> Since Adam already noticed, that there might not be a "perfect"
> value for all, this is the logical next step.
Noone ever questioned the fact that these tunables should in fact be
tunable.
> PS: If you update, please consider an update of your comments
> there, too ;-)
Patch is sent hours ago, and I did.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-07 17:49 2.5.46: ide-cd cdrecord success report MdkDev
2002-11-07 18:03 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-07 19:01 ` Robinson Maureira Castillo
2002-11-07 18:07 ` Adam Kropelin
[not found] ` <32894.62.65.205.175.1036692849.squirrel@webmail.starman.ee>
2002-11-08 1:53 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-11-08 2:10 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-08 2:49 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-11-08 8:05 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-08 10:14 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-11-08 11:43 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-11-08 13:58 ` Jens Axboe
2002-11-08 18:26 ` Whither the "system without /proc" crowd? Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021108114318.GX32005@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.