From: "Heinz J . Mauelshagen" <mauelshagen@sistina.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] strange behavior with 1.0.5 on Linux 2.4.19?
Date: Sat Nov 9 06:12:02 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021109130628.B12935@sistina.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1036727077.7035.50.camel@pslgregory>; from gkade@bigbrother.net on Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:44:36PM -0800
Gregory,
this proves my assumption right that something is fishy with the high
memory support in your SMP environment.
I guess that it might work as well in case you make a single processor kernel
_with_ high memory enabled and repeat the very same test and that it might
be a highmem/smp problem still to be fixed.
Anyone else with hints?
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:44:36PM -0800, Gregory Ade wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 06:28, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
>
> > > > If you have a chance to reconfigure the failing system temporarily,
> > > > running what you did before should reproduce the same problems (segfault
> > > > on snapshot creation after fresh reboot) in case there's _no_ bug in the
> > > > large/high memory support.
> > > > My assumption is that it will not.
>
> > There's no need to physically remove any DIMMs. Just cook up a kernel
> > without the patches you mentioned to get that elefant going and
> > without high memory support.
>
> Okay, I disabled high memory support (only change from production
> kernel), rebooted with this test kernel, and tried to create a snapshot:
>
> root@burpr(pts/0):~ 26 # lvcreate --snapshot --extents 512 --name
> tmp_snap /dev/vg00/tmp
> lvcreate -- INFO: using default snapshot chunk size of 64 KB for
> "/dev/vg00/tmp_snap"
> lvcreate -- doing automatic backup of "vg00"
> lvcreate -- logical volume "/dev/vg00/tmp_snap" successfully created
>
>
> It worked just fine:
>
> root@burpr(pts/1):log 28 # lvdisplay /dev/vg00/tmp
> --- Logical volume ---
> LV Name /dev/vg00/tmp
> VG Name vg00
> LV Write Access read/write
> LV snapshot status source of
> /dev/vg00/tmp_snap [active]
> LV Status available
> LV # 2
> # open 1
> LV Size 2 GB
> Current LE 512
> Allocated LE 512
> Allocation next free
> Read ahead sectors 120
> Block device 58:1
>
> So I removed it:
>
> root@burpr(pts/1):log 29 # lvremove /dev/vg00/tmp_snap
> lvremove -- do you really want to remove "/dev/vg00/tmp_snap"? [y/n]: y
> lvremove -- doing automatic backup of volume group "vg00"
> lvremove -- logical volume "/dev/vg00/tmp_snap" successfully removed
>
>
> No kernel oops or BUG in the dmesg.
>
> Again, the _ONLY DIFFERENCE_ between this test kernel and the production
> kernel is the high-memory support option. On the test kernel, it is
> off, and on the production kernel, it is set to 64GB.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> --
> Gregory K. Ade <gkade@bigbrother.net>
> http://bigbrother.net/~gkade
> OpenPGP Key ID: EAF4844B keyserver: pgpkeys.mit.edu
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-09 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-02 12:23 [linux-lvm] strange behavior with 1.0.5 on Linux 2.4.19? Gregory K. Ade
2002-10-04 3:54 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-08 15:07 ` Gregory Ade
2002-10-09 6:38 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-27 22:30 ` Gregory K. Ade
2002-10-28 3:21 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-28 22:38 ` Gregory K. Ade
2002-10-29 3:15 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-29 13:54 ` Gregory K. Ade
2002-10-31 6:52 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-10-31 16:55 ` Gregory Ade
2002-11-01 9:07 ` Wolfgang Weisselberg
2002-11-05 8:33 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-11-07 21:45 ` Gregory Ade
2002-11-09 6:12 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen [this message]
2002-11-11 5:56 ` Jon Bendtsen
2002-11-22 15:51 ` Gregory Ade
2002-12-05 21:35 ` Gregory Ade
2002-10-28 14:36 ` jon+lvm
2002-10-28 16:40 ` Gregory K. Ade
2002-10-29 15:21 ` Luca Berra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021109130628.B12935@sistina.com \
--to=mauelshagen@sistina.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.