From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
geert@linux-m68k.org, hch@infradead.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NCR53C9x ESP: C99 designated initializers
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 15:35:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021111203537.GC11636@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1037019925.2887.21.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:05:25PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Lots of drivers do
Yes, this part sucks. There needs to be an easy library function that
takes a scsi command pointer, sets up a wait queue, adds the wait queue
struct pointer to the scsi command, sleeps with a timeout, wakes up when
command completes via scsi_done() or timeout fires, returns value based
upon how wake up happened. Right now we don't have that, we only have a
little helper function, scsi_sleep(), for sleeping for a fixed length of
time.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-11 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-03 10:46 [PATCH] NCR53C9x ESP: C99 designated initializers Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-03 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-03 14:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-03 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-10 10:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-10 14:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-11 9:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-11 9:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-11 13:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-11 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-11 17:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-11-11 20:31 ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-11 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-11 20:35 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2002-11-11 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-11 21:24 ` Doug Ledford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-11 18:30 J.E.J. Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021111203537.GC11636@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.