All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, tausq@debian.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] glibc 2.3.1 - It's alive! - patches
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:27:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021111232711.GB12433@systemhalted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200211112253.gABMr09l003349@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>

> > Again, delayed traps can be "Invalid Operation" exceptions within these
> > floating point tests. We may be seeing some of those issues. I really
> > need to find a way to properly flush delayed exceptions.
> 
> Look at fldw,fstw.  Specifying register 0L forces the coprocessor
> to complete all previous floating-point insns.
> 

We currently use the following as a delayed exception trap barrier:

libc/glibc-2.3.1/sysdeps/hppa/fpu/fraiseexcpt.c

...
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fmpy,dbl %1,%%fr0,%0\n\t"
			/* FIXME: is this a proper trap barrier? */
			"fcpy,dbl %%fr0,%%fr0" : "=f" (d) : "0"(d));
...

And from the comment it seems that DHD wasn't sure either :)
I don't quite understand what is meant by specifying register 0L?

c.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-11 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-11  1:05 [parisc-linux] glibc 2.3.1 - It's alive! - patches Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11  1:19 ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 17:12   ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 17:36     ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 18:00       ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-11 18:20         ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 18:58           ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 20:42       ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 20:57         ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 21:17           ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 21:33             ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12  5:31               ` [parisc-linux] simple testcase for binutils visibility problem Randolph Chung
2002-11-12  5:58                 ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 21:16         ` [parisc-linux] glibc 2.3.1 - It's alive! - patches Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 22:36           ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 22:44             ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 22:53               ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 23:27                 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2002-11-12  0:22                   ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12  1:23                     ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-12  4:13                   ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12 15:44                     ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12 17:42                       ` Jim Hull
2002-11-12 17:53                         ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12 18:43                           ` Jim Hull
2002-11-12 19:02                             ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12 19:31                               ` Jim Hull
2002-11-12 19:38                                 ` John David Anglin
2002-11-13 19:22                       ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-13 20:16                         ` John David Anglin
2002-11-17 21:54           ` John David Anglin
2002-11-18 16:12             ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-18 17:42               ` John David Anglin
2002-11-18 19:30                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-18 19:44                   ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11  1:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-11  1:32   ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11  1:49     ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11  3:45       ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11  4:26         ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 15:03           ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 15:47             ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 16:26               ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 17:25                 ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 17:37                   ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 17:46                     ` John David Anglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021111232711.GB12433@systemhalted \
    --to=carlos@baldric.uwo.ca \
    --cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=tausq@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.