From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: riel@conectiva.com.br
Cc: hugh@veritas.com, akpm@digeo.com, dmccr@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush_cache_page while pte valid
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:45:52 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021112.134552.04696764.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0211121248540.3817-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:49:50 -0200 (BRST)
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> The flush merely writes back the data, a copy-back operation, fully L2
> cache coherent. All cpus will see correct data if an intermittant
> store occurs.
The CPUs will, but the harddisk might not.
We really need to get this right in the swapout path.
We do get it right, watch:
1) remove last mapping instance of page
-> MM level cache flush pushes it permanently to ram
in full view of DMA activity
2) remove last mapping, but new one appears as we swap out
-> no problem we'll see one of several instances of the
page and we'll need to reswap it out later anyways
if someone currently writes to it
I know this because I tested this extensively ages ago on sparc32
where it really mattered.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-12 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-11 18:25 [PATCH] flush_cache_page while pte valid Hugh Dickins
2002-11-11 18:35 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-11 23:19 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-11 23:34 ` [PATCH] [RFC] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN Roland Dreier
2002-11-11 23:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-11 23:58 ` Roland Dreier
2002-11-12 0:18 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-12 0:01 ` Roland Dreier
2002-11-12 14:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-12 14:20 ` Folkert van Heusden
2002-11-12 15:14 ` Roland Dreier
2002-11-12 16:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-12 15:50 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-11-12 20:36 ` Roland Dreier
2002-11-12 22:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-12 22:39 ` Roland Dreier
2002-12-04 18:31 ` rtnetlink replacement for SIOCSIFHWADDR Roland Dreier
2002-12-04 20:11 ` Andi Kleen
2002-12-31 23:11 ` [PATCH] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN Roland Dreier
2003-01-06 15:52 ` [PATCH] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN (resend) Roland Dreier
2003-01-06 23:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-07 8:58 ` [PATCH] increase MAX_ADDR_LEN David S. Miller
2002-11-12 6:53 ` [PATCH] flush_cache_page while pte valid Hugh Dickins
2002-11-12 6:53 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-12 14:49 ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-12 21:45 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-11-12 17:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-11-12 21:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-12 22:59 ` Hugh Dickins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-11 21:20 Manfred Spraul
2002-11-12 0:37 ` Russell King
2002-11-12 1:08 Ulrich Weigand
2002-11-12 20:53 Manfred Spraul
2002-11-12 22:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-12 21:32 Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021112.134552.04696764.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.