From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerald Roth <gerald.roth@aon.at>
Subject: Re: fsck.reiser4 error
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:09:48 +0100
Message-ID: <200211141909.48960.gerald.roth@aon.at>
References: <200211141643.gAEGhgS09039@mail.osdl.org> <001201c28c06$e078c9e0$ed7b55c2@figwam>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-11998-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <001201c28c06$e078c9e0$ed7b55c2@figwam>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

hi

please try to ship a stable reiser4fsck as soon as reiser4 has stabilized=
=2E
it is really important to have the chance to repair the fs _if_ something=
 goes=20
wrong, without the danger to damage it even more...=20

thanks for your great work! =20

although i didn't run any real benchmarks i can say that reiser4 feels a =
lot=20
faster than any fs i tried before....

regards,
gerald roth =20

On Thursday 14 November 2002 18:54, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your report. Actually fsck.reiser4 is supposed to be read=
y
> in a few months only. Yura, I thought we decided to have fsck excluded
> from the distribution for now, right?
>
> Thanks,
> Vitaly Fertman
>
>