From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] PostgreSQL and file system level backup Message-ID: <20021116031032.V17827@vestdata.no> References: <2D92FEBFD3BE1346A6C397223A8DD3FC09208C@THOR.goeci.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2D92FEBFD3BE1346A6C397223A8DD3FC09208C@THOR.goeci.com>; from murthy.kambhampaty@goeci.com on Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:25:49PM -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Nov 15 20:11:02 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Cc: Postgres Admin List , "Linux-Xfs (E-mail)" On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:25:49PM -0500, Murthy Kambhampaty wrote: > "Unless the postmaster is shut down meanwhile, you'll probably end up w= ith a > corrupt database. The problem is that xfsdump does not give you an > instantaneous snapshot of the filesystem state, so you will probably co= llect > inconsistent contents of the various files that make up the database." >=20 > Which gives rise to my present question: given that LVM DOES give an > instantaneous snapshot of the filesystem, would an xfsdump of an LVM > snapshot of an XFS filesystem give usable backups? Yes, it should. Allthough, some of the postgresql-developers use the term "corrupt database" of a database where the table-files are inconsistant. That's generally _always_ the case when the server is running, as the latest updates are only available in the database-log. That's also the case for the LVM-snapshot. This "inconsistancy" will be fixed by log-replay when you start the serve= r (after restore). If you want to avoid it, you can: - shut down databasee - take snapshot - start database - backup from snapshot There was a long thread on this subject on the postgresql-list a month or two ago. --=20 Ragnar Kj=F8rstad Big Storage