From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Run timers as softirqs, not tasklets
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 17:16:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021117171625.C7530@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
Seems to me that the timer code is attempting to replicate the softirq
characteristics at the tasklet level, which is a little pointless. This
patch converts timers to be a first-class softirq citizen.
Ingo, was there a reason you didn't do it this way to begin with?
diff -u linux-2.5.47-pci/include/linux/interrupt.h linux-2.5.47-pci/include/linux/interrupt.h
--- linux-2.5.47-pci/include/linux/interrupt.h 2002-11-16 22:28:40.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.5.47-pci/include/linux/interrupt.h 2002-11-17 11:23:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
enum
{
HI_SOFTIRQ=0,
+ TIMER_SOFTIRQ,
NET_TX_SOFTIRQ,
NET_RX_SOFTIRQ,
SCSI_SOFTIRQ,
--- linux-2.5.47/kernel/timer.c 2002-11-14 10:52:17.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.5.47-pci/kernel/timer.c 2002-11-17 11:27:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -66,9 +66,6 @@ typedef struct tvec_t_base_s tvec_base_t
/* Fake initialization */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(tvec_base_t, tvec_bases) = { SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED };
-/* Fake initialization needed to avoid compiler breakage */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_struct, timer_tasklet) = { NULL };
-
static void check_timer_failed(timer_t *timer)
{
static int whine_count;
@@ -766,9 +763,9 @@ rwlock_t xtime_lock __cacheline_aligned_
unsigned long last_time_offset;
/*
- * This function runs timers and the timer-tq in softirq context.
+ * This function runs timers and the timer-tq in bottom half context.
*/
-static void run_timer_tasklet(unsigned long data)
+static void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
{
tvec_base_t *base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, smp_processor_id());
@@ -781,7 +778,7 @@ static void run_timer_tasklet(unsigned l
*/
void run_local_timers(void)
{
- tasklet_hi_schedule(&per_cpu(timer_tasklet, smp_processor_id()));
+ raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
}
/*
@@ -1140,7 +1137,6 @@ static void __devinit init_timers_cpu(in
}
for (j = 0; j < TVR_SIZE; j++)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv1.vec + j);
- tasklet_init(&per_cpu(timer_tasklet, cpu), run_timer_tasklet, 0UL);
}
static int __devinit timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
@@ -1167,4 +1163,5 @@ void __init init_timers(void)
timer_cpu_notify(&timers_nb, (unsigned long)CPU_UP_PREPARE,
(void *)(long)smp_processor_id());
register_cpu_notifier(&timers_nb);
+ open_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ, run_timer_softirq, NULL);
}
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-17 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-17 17:16 Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2002-11-17 18:46 ` [PATCH] Run timers as softirqs, not tasklets Dipankar Sarma
2002-11-17 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-18 22:29 ` george anzinger
2002-11-18 22:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-17 19:23 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021117171625.C7530@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.