All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, rml@tech9.net, riel@surriel.com, akpm@zip.com.au
Subject: unusual scheduling performance
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:18:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021118081854.GJ23425@holomorphy.com> (raw)

On 16x, 2.5.47 kernel compiles take about 26s when the machine is
otherwise idle.

On 32x, 2.5.47 kernel compiles take about 48s when the machine is 
otherwise idle.

When a single-threaded task consumes an entire cpu, kernel compiles
take 36s on 32s when the machine is idle aside from the task consuming
that cpu and the kernel compile itself.

I suspect the scheduler, because cpu reporting in top(1) shows that a
two or more cpu-intensive tasks are concentrated on the same cpu, and
some long-lived tasks appear to be "bouncing" across cpus. If someone
with knowledge and/or expertise with respect to scheduling semantics
could look into this, I would be much obliged. Resolving this would
likely address many SMP and/or NUMA scheduling performance issues.


Thanks,
Bill

             reply	other threads:[~2002-11-18  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-18  8:18 William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-11-18 16:34 ` unusual scheduling performance Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-18 16:53   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-18 17:53     ` Dave Hansen
2002-11-18 18:16       ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-18 18:34         ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 18:52           ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-18 18:58             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 18:56           ` Dave Hansen
2002-11-18 18:59             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 20:17       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-11-18 22:51         ` Dave Hansen
2002-11-18 23:09           ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-18 23:20             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 23:26             ` Dave Hansen
2002-11-18 23:30               ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-18 23:33           ` Davide Libenzi
2002-11-20 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-11-20 22:19   ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021118081854.GJ23425@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.