diff for duplicates of <20021118194651.GE18374@opus.bloom.county> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 153feea..cb0d3a2 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,17 +1,20 @@ + On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:42:48PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: -> +> > > Patch was(and still is, I think) against linuxppc_2_4_devel. Don't > > know your tree, is it not the same as linuxppc? Anyhow, too much time > > has passed for me to remember all details and I don't have the time to > > go back and do it all over again. I suggest you take the linuxppc > > version, patch it and adopt it to your tree. -> +> > Why the hell are there two different trees? :'( Can't we work all > together for a better result? Because the linuxppc tree doesn't track the whole i2c tree, as that would be quite silly. :) --- +-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ + +** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/ diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 691fb91..5ffbfee 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ "ref\03DD939B5.3D1F2B6E@paradyne.com\0" "ref\0IGEFJKJNHJDCBKALBJLLIEBKFIAA.joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se\0" "ref\020021118204248.0a3b6bda.khali@linux-fr.org\0" - "From\0trini@kernel.crashing.org (Tom Rini)\0" - "Subject\08xx i2c refers to unspecified chip errata\0" - "Date\0Thu, 19 May 2005 06:23:42 +0000\0" + "From\0Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>\0" + "Subject\0Re: 8xx i2c refers to unspecified chip errata\0" + "Date\0Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:46:52 -0700\0" "To\0Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>\0" "Cc\0joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se" mds@paradyne.com @@ -11,22 +11,25 @@ " sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" + "\n" "On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:42:48PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:\n" - "> \n" + ">\n" "> > Patch was(and still is, I think) against linuxppc_2_4_devel. Don't\n" "> > know your tree, is it not the same as linuxppc? Anyhow, too much time\n" "> > has passed for me to remember all details and I don't have the time to\n" "> > go back and do it all over again. I suggest you take the linuxppc\n" "> > version, patch it and adopt it to your tree.\n" - "> \n" + ">\n" "> Why the hell are there two different trees? :'( Can't we work all\n" "> together for a better result?\n" "\n" "Because the linuxppc tree doesn't track the whole i2c tree, as that would\n" "be quite silly. :)\n" "\n" - "-- \n" + "--\n" "Tom Rini (TR1265)\n" - http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ + "http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/\n" + "\n" + ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/ -eae6fcc743c1990bf8ab3999a75ae4480411f3d4da4d2b7d767e0941a14e44aa +2babcfc6210f7c38e0c98781102b479674739aa0b29e25bb49729c8ed44251c8
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.