From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiserfs versions
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:35:26 +0300
Message-ID: <20021119093526.A32026@namesys.com>
References: <3DD97831.4030607@panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12017-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DD97831.4030607@panix.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kenny gorman <kgorman@panix.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello!

On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:30:57PM -0800, kenny gorman wrote:

> I guess I want to get what would be considered the most stable 
> combination of code vs. something bleeding edge, but also not old like 
> what I have now (and thus prone to bugs...).  I really like reiserfs, 
> but I have heard of (and experienced it now) about corruption problems.
> Currently, I am running (no laughing..):
> Suse 2.4.7-64GB-SMP

Upgrade this to vanilla 2.4.19 or if you prefer SuSE stuff - to
SuSE's errata 2.4.16 kernel.
Actually you might try more recent 2.4.20-pre (or rc) stuff if you want, too
if you do not feel it is too bleeding edge for you.

> lvm-0.9.1_beta7-10

Do not know about that.

> reiserfs-3.x.0j-17

This should be upgraded to latest reiserfsprogs which is 3.6.4.
3.x.0j is way too unstable.

Bye,
    Oleg