From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Margit Schubert-While <margit@margit.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: L1_CACHE_SHIFT value for P4 ?
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:47:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021121134721.GG9883@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021121134250.GA31081@wotan.suse.de>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:42:50PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> http://developer.intel.com/technology/itj/q12001/articles/art_2.htm
> -> "Netburst microarchitecture" -> Level 2 Instruction and Data Cache
> "The L2 cache is organized as an 8-way set-associative cache with 128 bytes
> per cache line. These 128-byte cache lines consist of two 64-byte sectors.
> A miss in the L2 cache typically initiates two 64-byte access requests to the
> system bus to fill both halves of the cache line.
Ok, this makes more sense. (and sounds familiar -- probably the same
thing I was pointed to last time this came up)
> It is refering to the older 256K cached P4, but I doubt they changed it.
> Your cache reporting may refer to the 64byte sectors or is just wrong
I think its counting just the sector. It certainly makes sense.
> (would not be the first time that has happened - some P4 versions also
> misreported their TLB size)
Interesting. I should go read the errata so x86info handles that correctly..
> For cache colouring purposes you need to use the 128 byte unit.
Agreed.
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-21 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4.3.2.7.2.20021121130236.00b15370@mail.dns-host.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-11-21 13:10 ` L1_CACHE_SHIFT value for P4 ? Andi Kleen
2002-11-21 13:23 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 13:42 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-21 13:47 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2002-11-21 15:03 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-11-21 14:39 Margit Schubert-While
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-21 13:25 Margit Schubert-While
2002-11-21 13:30 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-21 12:13 Margit Schubert-While
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021121134721.GG9883@suse.de \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=margit@margit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.