From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Becker Subject: Re: RFC - new raid superblock layout for md driver Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:06:07 -0800 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20021121200607.GF770@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com> References: <15835.2798.613940.614361@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021120160259.GW806@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com> <15836.7011.785444.979392@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20021121014625.GA14063@redhat.com> <20021121193424.GB770@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com> <20021121195406.GF14063@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021121195406.GF14063@redhat.com> To: Neil Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:54:06PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > opinion, the existence of both an MD and DM driver is wrong because they > are inherently two sides of the same coin This is exactly my point. I got "MD and DM should be used together" out of your email, and I guess I didn't get your stance clearly. Joel -- Life's Little Instruction Book #69 "Whistle" Joel Becker Senior Member of Technical Staff Oracle Corporation E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127