From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Drage Subject: Re: IPTABLES vs Checkpoint Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 01:11:44 +0000 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20021127011144.C14289@funkyjesus.org> References: <1038349954.22977.34.camel@tux.go-nix.ca> <000801c295a2$4a9cb620$0100a8c0@covert.tdyc.com> Reply-To: Nick Drage Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c295a2$4a9cb620$0100a8c0@covert.tdyc.com>; from rkrusty@tdyc.com on Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 04:19:36PM -0700 Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 04:19:36PM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > >AFAIK Checkpoint is not a firewall at all, but a proxy server. This > >clearly means that it acts like a Web/FTP/whatever server that connects > >people in your company to the outside world by requesting Web pages over > >HTTP and initiating FTP connections on their behalf. > > This is incorrect information. Checkpoint offers proxy capabilities > however by default it is a stateful firewall. Seconded. While Firewall-1 does have some proxy server like capabilities its main function is as a stateful firewall. -- FunkyJesus System Administration Team