From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Todd Lyons Subject: Re: reiserfsck --rebuild-tree on a big filesystem Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:52:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20021127045240.GA9212@mrball.net> References: <20021125153843.GC19254@mail.cekit.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021125153843.GC19254@mail.cekit.cz> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; x-action="pgp-signed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mira Temp=C3=ADr wanted us to know: >| This is very strange, We've seen reports of reiserfsck --rebuild-tree >| of 500Gb volume (filled to 170Gb) finished in 8 hours. >Can be the speed affected with high usage of FS (about 99%)? I don't know for sure. I was one of the 500 GB users who finished in 8 hours. That particular server was at 90% utilization IIRC. If it is sensitive to the size of the data on the disks, then it is a nonlinear relationship. I doubt it has anything to do with it and has more to do with bad blocks. - --=20 Blue skies... Todd | Get a bigger hammer! | Proponents of MIME in general e-mail | | http://www.mrball.net | can go multipart/encrypt themselves. | | http://faq.mrball.net | --Rick Moen | Linux kernel 2.5.46-1 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.14, 0.20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE95E+XIBT1264ScBURAgPIAJ98slpieL72fK7/TPURFEbJgw6w3gCgqXv9 brP7koUY9ffRrda1J0oJbAc=3D =3DHEsb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----