From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linus <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
anton@samba.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
ak@muc.de, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ralf@gnu.org,
willy@debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Start of compat32.h (again)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:29:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021127082918.GA5227@averell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15844.31669.896101.983575@napali.hpl.hp.com>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:00:53AM +0100, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:42:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> said:
>
> Stephen> I make the follwing assumptions: returning s32 from a 32
> Stephen> bit compatibility system call is the same as returning long
> Stephen> or int.
>
> That is not a safe assumption. The ia64 ABI requires that a 32-bit
> result is returned in the least-significant 32 bits only---the upper
> 32 bits may contain garbage. It should be safe to declare the syscall
> return type always as "long", no?
But the 32bit user space surely doesn't care about any garbage in
the upper 32bits, no ?
64bit user space might, but that's not driven by a shared compat layer.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-27 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-27 7:42 [PATCH] Start of compat32.h (again) Stephen Rothwell
2002-11-27 7:58 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 13:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-11-28 5:27 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-28 5:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 8:00 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-27 8:06 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 8:29 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2002-11-27 8:46 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-27 9:01 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-27 9:57 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 17:10 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-28 5:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-27 12:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-30 20:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-11-27 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-11-28 5:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-11-28 5:26 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-29 2:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-01 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-02 4:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-02 4:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-12-02 6:17 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-02 7:39 ` Richard Henderson
2002-12-02 7:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-02 7:59 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-02 8:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-04 11:22 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-05 21:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-28 5:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-11-29 4:45 ` [PATCH] 32 bit consolidation 1/Many (was: [PATCH] Start of compat32.h (again)) Stephen Rothwell
2002-11-29 4:52 ` [PATCH] 32 bit consolidation 2/Many Stephen Rothwell
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212011047440.12964-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1038804400.4411.4.camel@rth.ninka.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-12-02 8:13 ` [PATCH] Start of compat32.h (again) Andi Kleen
2002-12-02 8:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-02 9:07 ` Andi Kleen
2002-12-02 9:36 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-12-02 17:01 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-02 10:16 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-04 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-05 21:06 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-05 21:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-05 21:22 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-05 21:32 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021127082918.GA5227@averell \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@gnu.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.