From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from systemhalted (CPE0080c82c70ca.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.112.224.149]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2244838 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:22:37 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:22:26 -0500 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 2.5 status update 2002-11-29 Message-ID: <20021129192226.GA5760@systemhalted> References: <20021129190337.W1586@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20021129190337.W1586@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > We've merged 2.5.50 into our tree. It boots on an A500 (uniprocessor) > and compiles for most common configurations. Userspace apps still crash > a lot. Our diff vs Linus' tree is 536k, which seems like a lot, except > that it was around 2.7MB in the 2.5.44 timeframe. It compresses down to > about 130k which is comparable with other architectures. Here here! :) /me promises willy a pint Now if only I could cleanup our userspace with such impunity :} c.