From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvcreate distributed extent option Message-ID: <20021130170037.A15308@vestdata.no> References: <615A249B783CD41192F400D0B747AC860898265A@hesse.bbn.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <615A249B783CD41192F400D0B747AC860898265A@hesse.bbn.hp.com>; from holger_zecha@hp.com on Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 03:02:38PM +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat Nov 30 10:01:03 2002 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Cc: oolon@pzat.meep.org, lvm-devel@sistina.com On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 03:02:38PM +0100, ZECHA,HOLGER (HP-Germany,ex1) w= rote: > > How about striping with the strip size equal to that of a logical ext= ent? >=20 > This allows us to do more I/O's per second Only if you're only using a single or a few files at the time. If you're using many files in parallel you will get more I/O's per second by concatenating the devices instead if striping them. (that's what LVM does by default) --=20 Ragnar Kj=F8rstad