From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dharmendra.T" Subject: Re: Getting Closer But Still Having Problems Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:32:50 +0530 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <200212031032.50936.dharmu@nsecure.net> References: Reply-To: dharmu@nsecure.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Aaron Clausen , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi, If you compiled the module into the kernel just check with #dmesg | grep module If you get the output then you should not worry about it. Regards, Dharmendra.T Linux Security Expert www.nsecure.net dharmu@nsecure.net On Saturday 30 November 2002 01:25, Aaron Clausen wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Aaron Clausen wrote: > > Alright, I managed to get the patched 2.4.19 kernel *and* iptables 1.2.7a > > binaries and libraries to compile cleanly. Now I've got one last problem > > (I hope). When I run "make install all", everything compiles fine, but > > it won't overwrite the old iptables binaries and libraries. I suppose I > > have to remove these manually, so can somebody tell me where to look? > > Never mind. I did it the hard way, and everything is working A-okay. > Sorry for being so belligerant, I was just getting frustrated with the > whole darn thing. > > Now, another question. Is there anything particular I have to do to get > H.323 connection tracking working? I've compiled the code into the kernel, > so I don't need to load the modules, so is that it? > > Another quick question, will the H.323 tracking permit more than one > machine to go through NAT with Netmeeting or whatever? --