All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Vamsi Krishna S ." <vamsi@in.ibm.com>,
	torvalds@transmeta.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dprobes <dprobes@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com>,
	richard <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>, tom <hanrahat@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for 2.5.50-bk2
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 13:26:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021203132621.GA811@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p734r9vtg62.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:56:05PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

 > > This last part just got me thinking.
 > > What stops someone for example using this to implement a binary
 > > only replacement of the TCP/IP stack, or any other part of the
 > > kernel for that matter ?
 > 
 > It can be already easily done, just patch the kernel code in /dev/kmem
 > and add some jump instructions to your loaded module.
 > But it's not practical, because it's 100% binary dependent and would
 > break with every small change.

indeed.
 
 > Similar to kprobes. But kprobes is actually useful for kernel debugging/
 > tracing and unlike many other of these patches not very intrusive.

Suparna also just told me I overlooked the _GPL on the export.

		Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-03 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20021203125447.A2951@in.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <20021203121858.GC30431@suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-12-03 12:56   ` [PATCH] kprobes for 2.5.50-bk2 Andi Kleen
2002-12-03 13:26     ` Dave Jones [this message]
2002-12-03  7:24 Vamsi Krishna S .
2002-12-03 12:18 ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021203132621.GA811@suse.de \
    --to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=dprobes@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com \
    --cc=hanrahat@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=vamsi@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.