From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 00:21:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 00:21:22 -0500 Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com ([204.127.202.62]:10965 "EHLO sccrmhc02.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 00:21:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 21:24:03 -0800 From: Ben Fennema To: Rusty Russell Cc: Erlend Aasland , bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu, dave@trylinux.com, linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (i386) Message-ID: <20021203212403.B19780@attbi.com> References: <20021203125120.GA2417@johanna5.ux.his.no> <20021203233744.AA03F2C29E@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021203233744.AA03F2C29E@lists.samba.org>; from rusty@rustcorp.com.au on Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:37:04AM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:37:04AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > In message <20021203125120.GA2417@johanna5.ux.his.no> you write: > > I noticed that CONFIG_UDF_RW is not used anywhere, so I removed it from all > > the defconfigs. > > But it's used in 2.4.20. It *looks* like it's on by default in 2.5, > but I just want the authors to confirm that the option isn't coming > back. > > Ben, Dave? Yup.. It's gone for good. Ben