From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from delta.nisa.net (delta.nisa.net [207.194.212.31]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1E24829 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 15:31:10 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:30:54 -0800 From: Jeff Bailey To: John David Anglin Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" , libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Message-ID: <20021204223054.GA17573@nisa.net> References: <20021203024358.GA5487@systemhalted> <200212042213.gB4MD83F000234@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200212042213.gB4MD83F000234@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: FATAL: kernel too old Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:13:07PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > Is 2.4.18-pa52 really too old? Yes. hppa-linux requires 2.4.19 Tks, Jeff Bailey