From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: Bishop Brock <bcbrock@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk,
linux-pm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-pm-devel] Re: IBM/MontaVista Dynamic Power Management Project
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:18:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021205081850.GA1178@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1038938270.28176.2.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:57:49PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 18:46, Bishop Brock wrote:
> > IBM and MontaVista have initiated a joint project to develop a
> > dynamic power management control and policy mechanism for Linux
> > for processors supporting dynamic voltage and frequency scaling.
> > A paper describing the proposal can be obtained from
> >
> > http://www.research.ibm.com/arl/projects/dpm.html
> >
> > A working prototype of the proposed framework for
> > the IBM PowerPC 405LP processor exists and will be made
> > public in the near future.
>
> any idea if/how this will fit into the existing cross platform cpufreq
> framework ?
Actually, if I understand IBM's proposal right, it seems to be an
alternative to cpufreq: a different "mid-layer" between the low-level
processor drivers, other kernel code, and the user. So it's not an extension
to an existing feature, but a new feature - Halloween was some weeks ago...
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-05 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 17:46 IBM/MontaVista Dynamic Power Management Project Bishop Brock
2002-12-03 17:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-12-03 18:27 ` [Linux-pm-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
2002-12-03 20:00 ` Dominik Brodowski
2002-12-03 20:31 ` Hollis Blanchard
2002-12-05 8:18 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2002-12-03 18:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-03 18:45 ` [Linux-pm-devel] " Hollis Blanchard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-04 3:34 [Linux-pm-devel] " Bishop Brock
2002-12-05 8:48 ` Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021205081850.GA1178@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=bcbrock@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.