From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: non volatile ram devices
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:32:15 +0300
Message-ID: <20021205093215.B20015@namesys.com>
References: <200212042059.35300.russell@coker.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12113-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200212042059.35300.russell@coker.com.au>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Cc: ReiserFS <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Hello!

On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:59:35PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:

> I have some servers that are giving inadequate disk performance for Maildir 
> mail spools.  They are running kernel 2.4.19 (2.4.20 upgrade is planned) and 
> using ReiserFS for everything that's important.

May I ask what kind of inadequacy on what kinds of operations do you observe?

Thank you.

Bye,
    Oleg