From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Hanno Böck" <hanno-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Grover,
Andrew" <andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org,
arjanv-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
marcelo-KCZ47A4bww4P48s/oLjRZg@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [ACPI] RE: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:29:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021206072932.B16173@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>; from hanno-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org on Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
> > Well after communicating with Marcelo it sounds like he'd like to hold off
> > taking it in 2.4.21 because IDE changes take priority, and two big changes
> > at once is too many for a stable kernel revision.
>
> I think this is a very bad news. In my opinion, the ACPI-patch
> is the most-needed kernel-patch at the moment. For many laptop-users
> that don't know about this patch, Linux is nearly
> unuseable.
the 2.4 patch doesnt' actually offer suspend/resume capabilities; what
else did you have in mind as required ?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: "Hanno Böck" <hanno@gmx.de>
Cc: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>,
pavel@ucw.cz, arjanv@redhat.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ACPI] RE: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:29:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021206072932.B16173@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno@gmx.de>; from hanno@gmx.de on Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
> > Well after communicating with Marcelo it sounds like he'd like to hold off
> > taking it in 2.4.21 because IDE changes take priority, and two big changes
> > at once is too many for a stable kernel revision.
>
> I think this is a very bad news. In my opinion, the ACPI-patch
> is the most-needed kernel-patch at the moment. For many laptop-users
> that don't know about this patch, Linux is nearly
> unuseable.
the 2.4 patch doesnt' actually offer suspend/resume capabilities; what
else did you have in mind as required ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-06 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-06 1:36 [BK PATCH] ACPI updates Grover, Andrew
[not found] ` <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD04C7A576-OU+JdkIUtvd9zuciVAfUoVDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-06 11:59 ` [ACPI] " Hanno Böck
2002-12-06 11:59 ` Hanno Böck
[not found] ` <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-06 12:29 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2002-12-06 12:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <20021206072932.B16173-s/M1imWmeEoQw3kMeb7FcACJwEvxM/w9@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-06 13:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-12-06 13:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20021206131746.C10368-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-06 15:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-06 15:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-09 16:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-12-09 16:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.50L.0212091408120.10894-100000-h0V4oybiq0/QsHzvN0qAKK/+n4cY9krw@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 19:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-12-09 19:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20021209191252.N20336-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 19:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-12-09 19:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <20021209141720.A11277-s/M1imWmeEoQw3kMeb7FcACJwEvxM/w9@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-09 19:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2002-12-09 19:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2002-12-09 19:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-09 19:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-06 16:50 ` Pavel Machek
2002-12-06 16:50 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20021206165004.GE7961-jyMamyUUXNJG4ohzP4jBZS1Fcj925eT/@public.gmane.org>
2002-12-07 5:42 ` Sérgio Monteiro Basto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021206072932.B16173@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=arjanv-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hanno-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=marcelo-KCZ47A4bww4P48s/oLjRZg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.