From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [ACPI] RE: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:29:32 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <20021206072932.B16173@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>; from hanno-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org on Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hanno_B=F6ck?= Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org, arjanv-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, marcelo-KCZ47A4bww4P48s/oLjRZg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, acpi-devel-pyega4qmqnRoyOMFzWx49A@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Hanno B=F6ck wrote: > > Well after communicating with Marcelo it sounds like he'd like to h= old off > > taking it in 2.4.21 because IDE changes take priority, and two big = changes > > at once is too many for a stable kernel revision. >=20 > I think this is a very bad news. In my opinion, the ACPI-patch > is the most-needed kernel-patch at the moment. For many laptop-users > that don't know about this patch, Linux is nearly > unuseable.=20 the 2.4 patch doesnt' actually offer suspend/resume capabilities; what else did you have in mind as required ? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:22:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:22:10 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:20674 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:22:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:29:32 -0500 From: Arjan van de Ven To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hanno_B=F6ck?= Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , pavel@ucw.cz, arjanv@redhat.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [ACPI] RE: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates Message-ID: <20021206072932.B16173@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021206125943.2199892e.hanno@gmx.de>; from hanno@gmx.de on Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote: > > Well after communicating with Marcelo it sounds like he'd like to hold off > > taking it in 2.4.21 because IDE changes take priority, and two big changes > > at once is too many for a stable kernel revision. > > I think this is a very bad news. In my opinion, the ACPI-patch > is the most-needed kernel-patch at the moment. For many laptop-users > that don't know about this patch, Linux is nearly > unuseable. the 2.4 patch doesnt' actually offer suspend/resume capabilities; what else did you have in mind as required ?