From: Matt Porter <porter@cox.net>
To: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se>
Cc: Matt Porter <porter@cox.net>,
Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:52:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021206115206.C18257@home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IGEFJKJNHJDCBKALBJLLOEJHFIAA.joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se>; from joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se on Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:15:15PM +0100
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:15:15PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 05:08:22PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > that's a problem with m8xx_cpm_hostalloc() (or how you are using it) if
> > it doesn't keep around the values you need.
> >
>
> Yes and no, someone changed the m8xx_cpm_hostalloc() implementation and now
> it does not behave as it used to. Earlier both __pa(adr) and __va(__pa(adr))
> worked on addresses returned by m8xx_cpm_hostalloc().
>
> I think in it's current form it's useless and should either be changed back to what
> it was or die.
The 8xx-specific stuff is clearly Dan's area...I was just commenting
on your generic concerns about consistent_*.
Regards,
--
Matt Porter
porter@cox.net
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-06 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-06 13:18 Regarding consistent_alloc Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 13:23 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-06 14:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 15:59 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 16:08 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:30 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 18:15 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-06 18:52 ` Matt Porter [this message]
2002-12-06 19:59 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-06 22:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 0:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-07 12:53 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-07 16:53 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-09 9:06 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-10 17:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 3:52 ` acurtis
2002-12-11 8:57 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-11 9:58 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 14:41 ` acurtis
2002-12-11 15:01 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-11 15:36 ` acurtis
2002-12-12 3:32 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-11 14:56 ` Tom Rini
2002-12-11 15:07 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 3:41 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-12 8:00 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 8:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-12-12 8:37 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2002-12-12 12:56 ` Is the preemptive kernel patch unsafe for 8xx/PPC? Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-12 18:28 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-12 20:35 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-13 4:12 ` acurtis
2002-12-13 6:09 ` Eugene Surovegin
2002-12-13 7:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2002-12-16 14:41 ` acurtis
2002-12-13 4:08 ` acurtis
2002-12-12 16:53 ` "Missing" patches (Was: Re: Regarding consistent_alloc) Tom Rini
2002-12-06 16:56 ` Regarding consistent_alloc Dan Malek
2002-12-06 18:29 ` Matt Porter
2002-12-06 19:45 ` Dan Malek
2002-12-07 0:25 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-12-06 15:54 ` Matt Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021206115206.C18257@home.com \
--to=porter@cox.net \
--cc=joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=panto@intracom.gr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.