Re: non volatile ram devices

[Todd Lyons <todd@mrball.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matthias Andree wanted us to know:

>> I'm using a fairly vanilla kernel.  It's performance is 2 messages per second 
>> taken from qmail spool and delivered while there is a background load of pop 
>> access and new incoming mail.  IE if there is a backlog of mail to deliver 
>> the backlog gets smaller by 120 messages per minute.
>In my benchmarks on a plain FreeBSD ffs and a Micropolis 4345WS UWSCSI
>disk drive (7200/min) that was otherwise idle, qmail maxes out for
>remote 1-to-1 deliveries at a good 3 deliveries/s. It might improve a

You need to increase your remoteconcurrency limit.  Unless your emails
are 10's of Megabytes each, 3/s is way low.
- -- 
Blue skies...		Todd
| Get a bigger hammer!   |  All vendors suck, but different ones  |
| http://www.mrball.net  |  suck less in different applications.  |
| http://faq.mrball.net  |                --Andy Walden on NANOG  |
   Linux kernel 2.4.19-16mdk   1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE98XRlIBT1264ScBURAltmAJsED+JgbSx0CKWb1PIf5iopOXXLBQCeKebg
3LeZt00jkHlER19Mqt/bBCU=
=RldY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----