From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] max bomb segment tuning with read latency 2 patch in contest
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:20:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212071620.05503.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here are some io_load contest benchmarks with 2.4.20 with the read latency2
patch applied and varying the max bomb segments from 1-6 (SMP used to save
time!)
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 164.9 45 31 21 4.55
2420rl2b1 [5] 93.5 81 18 22 2.58
2420rl2b2 [5] 88.2 87 16 22 2.44
2420rl2b4 [5] 87.8 84 17 22 2.42
2420rl2b6 [5] 100.3 77 19 22 2.77
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.20 [5] 89.6 86 17 21 2.47
2420rl2b1 [3] 48.1 156 9 21 1.33
2420rl2b2 [3] 50.0 149 9 21 1.38
2420rl2b4 [5] 51.9 141 10 21 1.43
2420rl2b6 [5] 52.1 142 9 20 1.44
There seems to be a limit to the benefit of decreasing max bomb segments. It
does not seem to have a significant effect on io load on another hard disk
(although read latency2 is overall much better than vanilla).
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE98YUEF6dfvkL3i1gRAn4kAJ4x414sM3G+8fVrXv2P0huRhNKicgCgqFyo
kCXIKMVtO/Zp+tM92qlUz4s=
=HOKs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-07 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-07 5:20 Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-12-07 5:55 ` [BENCHMARK] max bomb segment tuning with read latency 2 patch in contest Andrew Morton
2002-12-07 6:09 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-07 6:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-12-07 6:15 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-12-07 6:20 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-12-07 6:45 ` [BENCHMARK] max bomb segment tuning with read latency 2 patchin contest Andrew Morton
2002-12-07 13:29 ` [BENCHMARK] max bomb segment tuning with read latency 2 patch in contest Con Kolivas
2002-12-10 10:50 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2002-12-10 10:55 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212071620.05503.conman@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.