* sgi linux version 2.4.18 cvs
@ 2002-12-05 11:50 ` ??
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ?? @ 2002-12-05 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips, Ralf Baechle
dear all,
how to check out sgi linux source version 2.4.18 from cvs?
best regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* sgi linux version 2.4.18 cvs
@ 2002-12-05 11:50 ` ??
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ?? @ 2002-12-05 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips, Ralf Baechle
dear all,
how to check out sgi linux source version 2.4.18 from cvs?
best regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: sgi linux version 2.4.18 cvs
2002-12-05 11:50 ` ??
(?)
@ 2002-12-05 12:23 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-10 12:25 ` ??
2002-12-20 3:37 ` ??
-1 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2002-12-05 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ??; +Cc: linux-mips
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:50:16PM +0800, ?? wrote:
Hello doublequestionmark,
> how to check out sgi linux source version 2.4.18 from cvs?
Use -rlinux_2_4_18 for checkout.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE
@ 2002-12-10 12:25 ` ??
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ?? @ 2002-12-10 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: linux-mips
dear all,
how to enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE?
is it enough if i only change
the definition of KERNEL_STACK_SIZE in include/asm-mips/processor.h ?
best regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE
@ 2002-12-10 12:25 ` ??
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ?? @ 2002-12-10 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle; +Cc: linux-mips
dear all,
how to enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE?
is it enough if i only change
the definition of KERNEL_STACK_SIZE in include/asm-mips/processor.h ?
best regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE
2002-12-10 12:25 ` ??
(?)
@ 2002-12-10 12:35 ` Ralf Baechle
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2002-12-10 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ??; +Cc: linux-mips
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:25:03PM +0800, ?? wrote:
> how to enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE?
>
> is it enough if i only change
> the definition of KERNEL_STACK_SIZE in include/asm-mips/processor.h ?
No, other changes would be needed also. HOWEVER: It's a very bad idea.
Stacks larger than 8kB require allocation of order 2 or even bigger
pages which will make the kernel unreliable. I really recommend to stick
with the current 8kB stacks.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [help] exec_usermodehelper() then content of CURRENT is destroyed
@ 2002-12-20 3:37 ` ??
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ?? @ 2002-12-20 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle, linux-mips; +Cc: cms
dear all,
1)in our 2.4.18 mips kernel , when we call exec_usermodehelper() (in
kernel/kmod.c)
the content of CURRENT is destroyed during [page_fault handler loading pages
from storage-device to ram]
which kind of error may cause this problem?
any hint/idea?
2)btw, in some mips linux port,
[syscall] is done by [scall_o32.S]
when [handle_sys] is done,
it will return by [o32_ret_from_sys_call],
[o32_ret_from_sys_call] will do [reschedule] and [signal],
but the question is here it doesn't check whether [syscall] is from
User-space or Kernel-space
if we use [syscall] in kernel-space, and do [signal] after [syscall] return,
won't it cause problem? is this bug of linux code?
thanks alot in advanced!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [help] exec_usermodehelper() then content of CURRENT is destroyed
@ 2002-12-20 3:37 ` ??
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ?? @ 2002-12-20 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle, linux-mips; +Cc: cms
dear all,
1)in our 2.4.18 mips kernel , when we call exec_usermodehelper() (in
kernel/kmod.c)
the content of CURRENT is destroyed during [page_fault handler loading pages
from storage-device to ram]
which kind of error may cause this problem?
any hint/idea?
2)btw, in some mips linux port,
[syscall] is done by [scall_o32.S]
when [handle_sys] is done,
it will return by [o32_ret_from_sys_call],
[o32_ret_from_sys_call] will do [reschedule] and [signal],
but the question is here it doesn't check whether [syscall] is from
User-space or Kernel-space
if we use [syscall] in kernel-space, and do [signal] after [syscall] return,
won't it cause problem? is this bug of linux code?
thanks alot in advanced!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-20 3:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-05 11:50 sgi linux version 2.4.18 cvs ??
2002-12-05 11:50 ` ??
2002-12-05 12:23 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-10 12:25 ` enlarge KERNEL_STACK_SIZE ??
2002-12-10 12:25 ` ??
2002-12-10 12:35 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-20 3:37 ` [help] exec_usermodehelper() then content of CURRENT is destroyed ??
2002-12-20 3:37 ` ??
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.