From: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
To: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, jsun@mvista.com
Subject: Re: Malta board patch
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:04:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021211090405.B6755@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DF6F54C.64858797@mips.com>; from carstenl@mips.com on Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 09:20:28AM +0100
A couple of nit-picking points ...
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 09:20:28AM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote:
> Index: arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/pci.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/pci.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.5.2.4
> diff -u -r1.5.2.4 pci.c
> --- arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/pci.c 28 Sep 2002 18:28:44 -0000 1.5.2.4
> +++ arch/mips/mips-boards/generic/pci.c 11 Dec 2002 08:11:56 -0000
> @@ -405,6 +405,12 @@
> ".set\treorder");
>
> irq = *(volatile u32 *)(KSEG1ADDR(BONITO_PCICFG_BASE));
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + ".set\tnoreorder\n\t"
> + ".set\tnoat\n\t"
> + "sync\n\t"
> + ".set\tat\n\t"
> + ".set\treorder");
> irq &= 0xff;
> BONITO_PCIMAP_CFG = 0;
> break;
Would a higher level macro such as __sync or fast_mb be better here?
> Index: arch/mips/mips-boards/malta/malta_int.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/mips-boards/malta/malta_int.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.8.2.6
> diff -u -r1.8.2.6 malta_int.c
> --- arch/mips/mips-boards/malta/malta_int.c 5 Aug 2002 23:53:34 -0000 1.8.2.6
> +++ arch/mips/mips-boards/malta/malta_int.c 11 Dec 2002 08:11:57 -0000
> @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@
> {
> unsigned int data,datahi;
>
> + /* Mask out corehi interrupt. */
> + clear_c0_status(IE_IRQ3);
> +
> printk("CoreHI interrupt, shouldn't happen, so we die here!!!\n");
> printk("epc : %08lx\nStatus: %08lx\nCause : %08lx\nbadVaddr : %08lx\n"
> , regs->cp0_epc, regs->cp0_status, regs->cp0_cause, regs->cp0_badvaddr);
> @@ -125,7 +128,6 @@
>
> /* We die here*/
> die("CoreHi interrupt", regs);
> - while (1) ;
> }
>
> void __init init_IRQ(void)
I think corehi interrupt should be blocked from the beginning. I seem to
remember a board errata itme that recommands not using it.
Jun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-11 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-11 8:20 Malta board patch Carsten Langgaard
2002-12-11 17:04 ` Jun Sun [this message]
2002-12-11 17:27 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-12-12 7:46 ` Carsten Langgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021211090405.B6755@mvista.com \
--to=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=carstenl@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.