From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from systemhalted (unknown [24.112.224.149]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A094829 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:17:43 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 18:17:38 -0500 From: Carlos O'Donell To: John David Anglin Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] ["CSA Test Drive" ] FW: Some issues Message-ID: <20021211231738.GA15513@systemhalted> References: <20021211224404.GC15219@systemhalted> <200212112305.gBBN5Bdj021432@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200212112305.gBBN5Bdj021432@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > The code doesn't seem to trap on a A500 which I believe is a PA8500. Could be a PA8600 too. > I think we need to look at bits 0..1 of the coprocessor configuration > register to determine instruction validity. See table 8-6 on page 8-11. > I can look at what the HP compiler does. Up to now, we have assumed > that all PA8000 machines have the same instruction set. I'm building a new kernel right now to run the test on again. My sociology exam is in a half-hour... I need a little break ;) c.