From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denis Ducamp Subject: Re: separation of sysctl and tcp-window-tracking patch? Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:17:35 +0100 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20021213151734.A31607@groar.org> References: <20021101021236.GA16306@pc.ilinx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from qralston+ml.netfilter-devel@andrew.cmu.edu on Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:05:33AM -0500 Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 03:05:33AM -0500, James Ralston wrote: > (My specific need is related to DNS service: namely, in many cases, 30 > seconds to establish a UDP session simply isn't enough time to permit > a reply to an outstanding DNS query. I want to be able to up that > timeout to something closer to 60 or 120 seconds.) If your DNS servers serve zones then make them send requests from the udp/53 port, then late replies are accepted as requests by the filter. Denis Ducamp.