From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:51:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:51:33 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:50950 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 10:51:29 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 15:59:21 +0000 From: Russell King To: Brian Murphy Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: serial_pci_tbl is incorrect for some Titan devices Message-ID: <20021215155921.C6486@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Brian Murphy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3DFC9E8E.8040702@murphy.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3DFC9E8E.8040702@murphy.dk>; from brian@murphy.dk on Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 04:23:58PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 04:23:58PM +0100, Brian Murphy wrote: > There are still some Titan devices defined around line 990 in > 8250_pci which use the old format for this structure. Is there > any chance that the patch I submitted a while ago to fix this > problem will be accepted? No, because as far as I can tell, I didn't receive such a patch. The only patch I have that's outstanding from you is for the IRQ255 problem - I believe at the time there was some debate about whether it was the right way to handle the problem or not. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html