From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:19:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:18:08 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:27029 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:17:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:25:34 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Ben Collins Cc: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy Subject: Re: Notification hooks Message-ID: <20021216092534.F432@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Ben Collins , Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Larry McVoy References: <20021216171218.GV504@hopper.phunnypharm.org> <20021216171925.GC15256@suse.de> <20021216172330.GW504@hopper.phunnypharm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021216172330.GW504@hopper.phunnypharm.org>; from bcollins@debian.org on Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:23:30PM -0500 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > True. But if the load is too much for bkbits to handle, I'd like Linus > to consider it just for maintainers. bkbits can keep up, that's not the issue. The main problem is coming up with an interface that makes sense for people. The mechanisms are all there already in the form of triggers. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm