From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:02:48 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Cort Dougan , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Support for Arctic platform (405LP based) Message-ID: <20021216150248.GI6095@opus.bloom.county> References: <20021213043628.GI21319@zax.zax> <20021212215126.V23952@duath.fsmlabs.com> <20021213151808.GI19456@opus.bloom.county> <20021215121526.M30941@duath.fsmlabs.com> <15869.5023.549830.146265@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <15869.5023.549830.146265@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 10:43:27AM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Cort Dougan writes: > > > How about killing the _2_4_devel tree? When I created it I want it to be a > > playground for stabilizing then moving things over to 2_4 failry quickly. > > It seems to have become the defacto "want board X, you better use > > _2_4_devel" tree. > > Now that Marcelo is using BK, what I would really like to do is to > kill both the linuxppc_2_4 and linuxppc_2_4_devel trees and move to a > tree that is a child of Marcelo's linux-2.4 tree. ... but old history? :) [snip] > ... There is no particular reason that I can see why the 8xx > stuff in 2_4_devel shouldn't go to Marcelo for 2.4.21. I'll try and get to that too, once finals are over :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/