From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:19:01 -0700 To: jsoe0708@tiscali.be Cc: Ed Schaller , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] quad tulip now not functional in 2.4.20 Message-ID: <20021217181901.GA2254@dsl2.external.hp.com> References: <3DED9BBD000021C7@ocpmta7.freegates.net> <3DED9BBD000022D4@ocpmta7.freegates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3DED9BBD000022D4@ocpmta7.freegates.net> From: grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com (Grant Grundler) Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:14:10PM +0100, jsoe0708@tiscali.be wrote: > >I will try to revert tulip driver and advise you. > Well I find some minutes to do this reverse and it works. > Still have to find the bug ? Unfortunately yes. But since the diff is small, it's alot easier. I'm most suspicious about the added checks for length field in eeprom. But I'll review the diff again and tinker with it today or tomorrow. I added that thinking that code only gets executed when there is no phy table (eg built-in). But the add-on cards do have a phy table. grant