From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:44:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:44:07 -0500 Received: from mailproxy1.netcologne.de ([194.8.194.222]:34029 "EHLO mailproxy1.netcologne.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:44:07 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: =?iso-8859-15?q?J=F6rg=20Prante?= Reply-To: joergprante@netcologne.de To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [2.4.21-pre1] scx200.c in arch/i386/kernel Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:51:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: wingel@nano-system.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <200212180051.07749.joergprante@netcologne.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I just compiled 2.4.21-pre1 for a consistency check with all configure options set to 'y' and found a file arch/i386/kernel/scx200.c which does not compile because of missing support in the Makefile. It is introduced by the 2.4.21-pre1 patch by Marcelo. Is there a reason why it's in the kernel directory of the i386 architecture? This is a very unusual place. I moved it to drivers/char/scx200.c and it compiles like a charme, after correcting the Makefiles. Is there any chance of moving it to from the arch directory to a more appropriate place? Or did I misunderstand? I don't know the scx200 Nat Sem chips, I don't have one and I don't even care, it's just because I'm doing some thorough build checks on my new -jp kernel patch set. Best regards, Jörg