From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:22:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:22:16 -0500 Received: from deimos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.190]:49107 "EHLO deimos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:22:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:29:59 -0800 To: Rusty Russell Cc: Linux kernel mailing list , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] : More module parameter compatibility for 2.5.52 Message-ID: <20021218022959.GA25958@bougret.hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: jt@hpl.hp.com References: <20021217173346.GA22924@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <20021218022816.E2EC52C2CE@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021218022816.E2EC52C2CE@lists.samba.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. E-mail: jt@hpl.hp.com From: Jean Tourrilhes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:24:57PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > > I think you're confusing "param_array() doesn't handle 2d arrays" with > "infrastructure not powerful enough". Since __module_param_call() is > functionally equivalent to __setup(), the second one seems unlikely. > > Writing such an extension is a job for the next mail... > > Does that clarify? Perfect. > Rusty. Good luck... Jean