From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Till Immanuel Patzschke <tip@inw.de>,
lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:24:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021219012453.GJ31800@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021219011541.GI31800@holomorphy.com>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 04:53:45PM -0800, Till Immanuel Patzschke wrote:
>> forgot the kernel version (2.4.20aa1)...
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 05:15:41PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> 2.4.20aa1 is missing some of the infrastructure to reduce the cpu
> consumption under high process count loads, but that's not going to
> help you anyway. 150K processes is not going to be feasible in the
> immediate future (months or longer away) so you'll have to figure out
> how to take that into account.
Er, sorry, on a brief rereading my eyes deceived me and I thought an
extra zero got in there. 15K is fine on 2.5 + patches.
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-19 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 0:46 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 0:47 ` [Lse-tech] " Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19 0:53 ` Till Immanuel Patzschke
2002-12-19 1:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:12 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:20 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 1:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 1:42 ` Robert Love
2002-12-19 1:44 ` David Lang
2002-12-19 2:05 ` [Lse-tech] " William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 15:05 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-19 10:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 10:37 ` Alex Tomas
2002-12-19 10:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 15:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-12-19 15:15 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-12-19 1:24 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-12-19 0:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-12-19 1:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-12-19 14:59 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021219012453.GJ31800@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tip@inw.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.