From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiserfs and TUX2 - 2.4.18 or 2.4.19?
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:47:26 +0300
Message-ID: <20021220104726.A23257@namesys.com>
References: <1040346481.bb5f0760teodarren@myrealbox.com> <20021220091717.A10948@namesys.com> <20021220071131.GA8162@matrix.wg>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12187-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021220071131.GA8162@matrix.wg>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Dirk Mueller <dmuell@gmx.net>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Hello!

On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:11:31AM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:

> >    If you'd have canilla 2.4.18, you'd need
> >    2.4.18.pending and 2.4.19.pending
> >    With RedHat some of these patches might be already included, so
> >    you probably need to try and see it for yourself which ones are missing. 
> Wouldn't it be better to push the changes into the vanilla kernel to save 
> everyone from this patch nightmare?

Well, all of the changes are in latest kernel already (2.4.20 as of now).
But the question was about using old kernel (well, may be not that old.
And patched by RedHat. And this was 56 megabytes of patches last time I checked)

Bye,
    Oleg