From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - starvation_limit
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 12:40:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212231241.01049.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212221703070.10806-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>one other thing that would be interesting to test on the osdl machines
>would be the effect of different filesystems.
>
>the origional set of tests were all done on reiserfs, it would be
>interesting to see if there is a difference between it and the others.
The current osdl hardware uses ext3 in the default journalling mode. Trying
different filesystems is something I have had planned for a while. When I get
the hardware sorted out as I need it to do this I will post some results
where comparisons can be made.
See the current specs here:
http://www.osdl.org/projects/ctdevel/results/
Con
>
>David Lang
>
>On 22 Dec 2002, Robert Love wrote:
>> Date: 22 Dec 2002 20:06:51 -0500
>> From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
>> To: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
>> Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>> Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest -
>> starvation_limit
>>
>> On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 18:48, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> > osdl, contest, tunable - starvation limit on 2.5.52-mm1
>>
>> Con, curiously, what is this OSDL hardware like?
>>
>> One thing I always liked about your Contest runs were you did them on
>> your home machine, which was presumably fairly run-of-the-mill so we
>> could keep an eye on the low-end desktop machines.
>>
>> Robert Love
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+BmmrF6dfvkL3i1gRApCRAJ96mtrpTCap5JoCQAX6UB3O39y3bgCcDoXM
XMa0Pz9Ldrdir9LQ4Qj83pI=
=CmgE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-23 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 23:48 [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - starvation_limit Con Kolivas
2002-12-23 1:06 ` Robert Love
2002-12-23 1:05 ` David Lang
2002-12-23 1:40 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-12-23 2:52 ` Robert Love
2002-12-23 1:38 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-23 1:48 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212231241.01049.conman@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.